šŸŽ‰ Free launch period — every calculator, every feature unlocked, no account needed, through mid-November 2026. PDF reports carry a watermark for everyone during this period.
NFPA 77 (static-electricity dissipation guidance)6 min read

Worked Example: Static Dissipation Bonding Resistance at a Tank Truck Loading Rack

The same NFPA 77 threshold, applied to two very different real-world bonding-clip readings — one a clean pass, one a clear failure needing immediate attention.

Scenario

Threshold1,000,000 Ī© (1 MĪ©) — commonly-cited NFPA 77 static-dissipation guidance
Case A — measured bonding resistance25,000 Ī© (a bonding clip on a truck with some surface corrosion)
Case B — measured bonding resistance2,500,000 Ī© (a clip with a failed or missing connection)

Step-by-step calculation

Step 1: Compare Case A against the threshold

Measured resistance ≤ threshold?
25,000 Ī© ≤ 1,000,000 Ī©
Passes — 40x below the threshold

Step 2: Classify Case A's connection quality

The calculator distinguishes a tight metallic bond (very low resistance) from one that merely clears the static-dissipation threshold.

Step 3: Compare Case B against the threshold

Measured resistance ≤ threshold?
2,500,000 Ī© ≤ 1,000,000 Ī©
Fails — 2.5x over the threshold

Result summary

CheckRequirementActualStatus
Case A bonding resistance≤ 1,000,000 Ī©25,000 Ī©āœ“ PASS
Case B bonding resistance≤ 1,000,000 Ī©2,500,000 Ī©āœ— FAIL
Case A's 25,000 Ī© reading passes comfortably but flags a connection worth inspecting (a proper metallic bond should read far lower). Case B's 2,500,000 Ī© reading is a clear failure — the bond will not reliably dissipate static charge and must be repaired before loading resumes.

Key insight: There's a meaningful difference between 'passes the threshold' and 'is a good connection.' A reading like Case A's 25,000 Ī© clears the 1 MĪ© static-dissipation limit with huge margin, but is still two to three orders of magnitude higher than a properly tight all-metal bond — which is exactly the kind of early warning sign (corrosion, a loose clamp, paint on the contact surface) worth acting on before it degrades into an actual failure like Case B.

Try it with your own numbers

Every input in this example is editable in the live calculator — free, no signup.

Open Static Bonding & Grounding Check calculator →

Frequently asked questions

Why is 1 MĪ© the threshold instead of a much lower number?

Static charge dissipation doesn't need a low-impedance path the way a fault-current or lightning path does — it only needs to bleed off a slow accumulation of static charge fast enough to prevent a dangerous voltage buildup, and NFPA 77's commonly-cited 1 MĪ© guidance reflects that far more modest requirement, which is why a bonding path can be orders of magnitude worse than a proper equipment ground and still work for its intended static-dissipation purpose.

Does passing this check mean the bond is also adequate for fault current or lightning?

No — static dissipation, equipment (fault-current) grounding, and lightning protection all have different, unrelated impedance requirements. A bonding clip that passes this static-dissipation check at 25,000 Ī© would be completely inadequate as an equipment safety ground, which typically needs an impedance low enough to ensure protective devices operate quickly during a fault.

More in Earthing, Lightning & Static Safety

← Back to all worked examples